Forum world of warships slow ui1/2/2024 ![]() ![]() Though not the enhanced accuracy those 2 should remain special for secondary build purposes. I also want to globally buff the American 127mm/38 twin secondaries from the ridiculously slow 6 second reload (a gun crew that slow would be getting hell from the XO at the very least) to the same 4 sec as Massachusetts and Georgia. Though if WG doesn't want to do that, it could simply be Florida '11 or Utah for the Florida class BB and any other pair of state names for my paper ships. Minnesota remains as is because I'm replacing her current SoDak hull with a slightly larger paper ship. I would also suggest that the premium Florida's name be changed since the real Florida will be part my proposal. Because of this I've used the name Kansas for a paper ships and renamed the SoDak Kansas to Indiana. I'm also suggesting that some names be changed, because I greatly dislike the fact that Kansas and Minnesota (which are not in fact paper ships) weren't given their real names South Dakota and Indiana. And to flesh out the slow BB line, I have revisions to both it and the standard line. For those who have a need for speed, there's the battlecruiser and fast battleship line. ![]() So here's my proposal to solve both those problems. There's also the fact that a line that revolves around slow BBs just isn't for everybody. Not simply because of the performance of the ships (though there's certainly that too in the eyes of many players, at least prior to the T10) but also because it was only 3 ships and failed to add the many actually-built US Navy BB classes that remain unrepresented in WOWS. It's no secret that the USN battleship line split was a disappointment to many. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |